Coaches Behaving Badly

Yesterday was a remarkable day in the world of sports news. Two highly successful coaches were the subjects of criticism. One for opening his mouth, the other for opening his fly. And in each case they showed a continuing lack of morals and wisdom.

Photograph of Coach Bobby Petrino at the 2010 ...

Coach Bobby Petrino

Bobby Petrino was fired as head coach of the University of Arkansas football team. Ozzie Guillen should be fired as Manager of the Major League Baseball Miami Marlins.

The Razorback is the mascot of the University ...

As I understand the facts of Petrino’s case he deserves some sort of prize for possessing the largest testicles since Rod Blagojevich. While vacationing with his family the 51-year old Petrino went for a motorcycle ride, where he met up with his 25-year-old mistress. Together they managed to wreck his Harley Davidson, Apparently driving it into a ditch. Knowing he was in trouble Petrino asked that a witness to the accident not call 9-1-1. Petrino called an aide who came and picked up him and Jessica Dorrell. If I have the story straight, the girlfriend was dropped off at her car and Petrino was taken to the hospital. (And while having an inappropriate relationship with the 51 year old, married football coach with four kids, did I also mention Dorrell had a fiance`?)

The Arkansas Razorbacks football program is a highly visible top-notch program. Last year they finished 11-2 as the 5th ranked team in the country. Playing in the South Eastern Conference, they were expected to compete for a National Championship this year.

While not advocating Petrino’s affair with Dorrell, that was not his fireable mistake. There were several. When questioned by his employer and media about his accident Petrino lied. He said he was the only one on the bike. Later, a police report revealed the presence of Dorrell. Also, 3 days prior to this April 1 motorcycle accident Petrino had hired Dorrell to his staff. In doing so he failed to reveal his intimate relationship with the former Arkansas volleyball player to his boss, Athletic Director Jeff Long.

Petrino took the Arkansas job in 2007 when he unexpectedly quit on the NFL’s Atlanta Falcons only 13 games into their season, showing himself then to be a rat. Long fired that rat yesterday, for cause, thus eliminating any right Petrino had to an $18-million buy-out clause in his contract. Long made the correct decision.

Now, if only the Miami Marlins owner Jeff Loria would make the same decision with Guillen.

Ozzie Guillén managed the White Sox from 2004 ...

The former Chicago White Sox Manager has a mouth that never stops. For those like me who aren’t easily offended his bombasity is endearing. He says some of the most outrageous stuff, including last week when he told reporters he likes to get drunk after every game, win or lose.

But when he told a Time Magazine reporter that he “Loves Fidel Castro“, he disqualified himself from ever Managing the Miami Marlins. Let me be clear. Were he still in Chicago, or managing any other Major League team, his comment would be chalked up as Ozzie-being-Ozzie. It would be largely unimportant. In fact Guillen said much the same thing in a 2008 interview with a Chicago reporter and nothing came of it.

But the Marlins just built a new $624-million palace stadium in the community of Miami known as Little Havana. Dade County, Florida is more than 50% Latino and most of those are Cuban immigrants or their descendants. The Cuban Dictator who has run the authoritarian communist regime 90-miles south of Miami for the past 50 years is their sworn enemy. City and County leaders in Miami have already called for Ozzie Guillen to be the former Manager of the Miami Marlins. Protesters demonstrated outside the location of Guillen’s nationally televised apology yesterday. He offended his teams entire fan-base. Apology or not he doesn’t belong in Miami.

The Cuban leader Fidel Castro. Español: El líd...

And any leftist wacko, like Michael Moore, who agrees with Guillen and likes the murderous dictator with the long ugly beard…your opinion doesn’t count. It doesn’t count because you are not a tax paying citizen of Dade County Florida or ticket buying fan of the Miami Marlins.  It doesn’t matter what I think of Castro. And as I mentioned earlier, any other city on the country, it wouldn’t matter that Guillen loves a man who has enslaved a whole island of human beings and denied democratic elections, and imprisoned political opponents, killing many for more than 50 years. But in Miami it matters.

Guillen’s insensitivity and stupidity just one week into his first season as Miami Manager displays a callous disregard for those he serves. Fire him. Because there is one thing you can be sure of with Ozzie…he’ll do it again.

The fact that Bobby Petrino is a self-absorbed, morally questionable person and Ozzie Guillen is a self-absorbed loud mouth with questionable beliefs is perfectly OK, if that’s what they want to be. But it’s equally OK for their employers to determine such people are not the type of people we want representing our multi-million dollar enterprise. Arkansas came to that conclusion. The Marlins should.

Thanks for visiting. Comments are welcome.

It Takes a Village? What Crap!

Somewhere along the line a significant portion of our proud American populace got the wrong impression of what makes America great and what led us to becoming the world’s most powerful nation, and desirable destination. The wrong-headed philosophy is summarized in the abbreviated title to

The ghostwriter for Hillary Clinton's memoirs ...

Hillary Clinton‘s 1996 book, “It Take’s a Village: And other Lessons Our Children Teach Us.” “It take’s a village” thinking has grown into what we see today from President Obama and Democrats everywhere. It’s the belief that if we are going to go forward we must all do so together. And I’m here standing shoulder to shoulder with John Adams, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt and many other great leaders from our past saying such thinking is crap. At best, such thinking is misguided. And at worst such thinking is highly destructive.

According to our current Secretary of State, her book’s title derives from an old African saying. It’s full statement being: “It takes a village to raise a child.” Being a life long Democrat it’s not the least bit surprising that Mrs. Clinton would believe such a philosophy. The actual fact is it takes a family and whenever possible two parents.

But the mentality which now infects everything pursued by Barrack Obama

Official photographic portrait of US President...

started back in the 1960s with the advent and temporary popularity of communal living. The idea, championed by the hippies and drug culture, was that you could live together in a small community and collectively share food, water, living space, and philosophy. To determine the wisdom of such thinking I would simply tell you to ask yourself, how many of those 60s and 70s commune’s flourish today?. How many exist?

I’ll admit it’s an attractive philosophy that’s very tempting to embrace. It promises security, and friendship, and a sense of one-ness with others. All of which is good. Right? The problem is, like the philosophy espoused by

A portrait of Karl Marx.

Karl Marx

Karl Marx it doesn’t work. It’s a lie to think that we can all live equally.

President Obama said repeatedly in his 2008 election campaign that he wanted to fundamentally change America. I have no doubt he wants to do exactly that. But here is what must be understood. You must understand what America is and what the former Illinois Senator wants to change it from. You must understand from whence we came.

On the subject of security and comfort as promised by the “It Takes a Village” philosophy Benjamin Franklin wrote, “Any people that would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety.”

The great statesman Patrick Henry correctly noted “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.”

Restrain the people? The men who believed in Liberty and founded this country would never stand for such a thing. Over the course of more than 200 plus years our Government has continued to plague its people with increasingly more laws, rules, regulations and restrictions all in the name of need or necessity forgetting the words uttered by

William Pitt

William Pitt

William Pitt on the floor of the House of Commons in 1783 “Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves.” 

Sadly I know that too many look back on the words and writings of 18th Century heroes as quaint, but impractical for today’s living. In their minds the collective is far superior than the individual. Twenty years ago Russian author Tatyana Tolstaya observed in an issue of The New Republic:

Taken individually, in short, everyone is not good. Perhaps this is true, but then how did all these scoundrels manage to constitute a good people? The answer is that “the people” is not “constituted of.” According to [collectivists] “the people” is a living organism, not a “mere mechanical conglomeration of disparate individuals.” This, of course, is the old, inevitable trick of totalitarian thinking: “the people” is posited as unified and whole in its multiplicity. It is a sphere, a swarm, an anthill, a beehive, a body. And a body should strive for perfection; everything in it should be smooth, sleek, and harmonious. Every organ should have its place and its function: the heart and brain are more important than the nails and the hair, and so on. If your eye tempts you, then tear it out and throw it away; cut off sickly members, curb those limbs that will not obey, and fortify your spirit with abstinence and prayer.


 Hungarian immigrant Professor Tibor R. Machan summarized the “It Take’s a Village” philosophy in a 1993 essay called “The Fear of Individualism”. He referred to such thinkers as “collectivists”: 

“Members of society do have different roles; the economists speak convincingly of the benefits of the division of labor. The errors of the collectivists are (1) their presumption that they know better than the individuals involved which members of society are less important, and (2) they have the right to eliminate those members. But individuals are ends in themselves, not animals to be sacrificed on the altar of the collectivist state.”

Respecting individual capabilities, including the ability to fail, is the only way the United State‘s came to its great position of power and leadership in the world today. Do we really want to disrespect each and every individual by claiming “we know better”? George Orwell‘s “Animal Farm” captures THAT belief when the lead pig states, “Some are more equal than others.” With Democrats, Liberals, Progressives, and Obama…they’re the pigs.

Thanks for visiting. Comments are welcome.

The Deaths of the 12 Apostles

When questioning the facts of Christianity I wonder if atheists ever give thought to how the 12 Apostles of Jesus died? It seems to me that if you want to really know Jesus or something about who he is and what he did you’re best-off knowing or learning of the people who were there, walked with him, talked with him, learned from him and witnessed the miracles. And if you are a non-believer how do you explain the deaths of most of these Apostles? What mania could have taken hold of these 12 divergent men that they would subject themselves to such fierce persecution and painful death in the name of what they preached and believed?

Isn’t it common sense to figure that they bore witness to something so extraordinary that they were compelled to undergo such torture rather than retract their beliefs? The link below provides a sanitized version of the deaths of the Apostles:

The Deaths of the 12 Apostles.

This video provides a more detailed version of the gore that fell upon most of the Apostles:

Faith will carry us through, but having faith does not exempt us from logical thinking.

Thanks for visiting. Comments are welcome.

Shelby Steele: The Exploitation of Trayvon Martin – WSJ.com

This editorial from the Wall Street Journal is so well written I wish I’d written it myself. Fact is, I did, many times, using different words. This piece is more about being black in America than it is Trayvon Martin. Thank goodness it’s written by a black man who clearly has a better perspective than I.

Shelby Steele: The Exploitation of Trayvon Martin – WSJ.com.

Thanks for visiting. Comments are welcome.

25 Years Since My Life Began…and A Lot Has Changed.

This Holy week is particularly special because I will be passing a milestone of tremendous significance to me. April 3, 1987 was the last day I spent in my life as an unmarried man. Put another way, my 25th wedding anniversary is April 4th.

I won’t bore you in this blog telling you how I love my wife, I do. Or how scared I was that wonderful day, I was terrified. It’s not necessary for me to wax-on about the many happy times we’ve spent, there are plenty. And I need not tell you of the commitment required from a man and a woman to stay married this long and however many more years we’re fortunate enough to enjoy together, total commitment.

But my reflective nature did think it was important to write about a significant change that has occurred in the last twenty-five years. Most notable is the fact that my marriage exists at all, and that no one (seemingly) has a problem with that. My wife is black, I am white. And this fact is nearly meaningless today.

This was not the case when we exchanged vows in Seattle, WA in 1987. We were a rarity. And we were a controversial rarity. My Dad was not shy in expressing his opposition to my marriage specifically and to interracial marriage in general. He told me. And in one sad and pathetic and somewhat funny telephone conversation he told my soon to be Mother-in-law. My Dad later claimed to have had too much to drink one night a couple of months before the wedding date when my would-be Mother-in-law called him on the phone to invite him to take a more active role in planning the wedding of her daughter to his son. As was told to me later he told her he was not interested in participating, or even attending the wedding. As the story goes he proceeded to clumsily explain to her the few times in his life where he felt he’d been “hurt” or “damaged” by people who were black. My Mother-in-law, being a strong and smart woman, quietly listened. And when he had finished his pathetic little rant she calmly asked, “Now, would you like to hear all the times white people had “hurt” me?” Having been born in Alabama in 1940 it didn’t take a PHd in Sociology to figure her list was long and severely more substantial than whatever my Bellingham, WA born Father was able to muster. He sheepishly declined to hear her tales. And he did attend our wedding. Though he told no one in advance that he would do so, and when my bride and I first became aware of his presence at our reception it was a pleasant surprise. He was one of the very few of my family members to attend. The cousins I grew up with and celebrated every Christmas, Thanksgiving, 4th of July and other holiday’s and special events didn’t come or send gifts or cards. My Nana, my Dad’s mother, likewise failed to come or acknowledge our wedding. One of my two Aunt’s, one of my Uncles; none attended my wedding or acknowledged it in any way.

It hurt my heart that people who raised me and loved me had such unprincipled views toward the issue of race and family. But it was a stance from which society allowed them to feel comfortable. Even in the 1980s I felt the discomfort, the staring eyes, the unwelcome attitudes, the bias from others because I was with a woman whose skin was darker than mine. It remained an issue years into our marriage. I still remember how offended I was at a news teaser from KING 5 News Anchor Jean Enerson in which she announced a feature story upcoming for the 5 o’clock news by say, “Interracial Marriages!!! Tune in at 5 o’clock for the inside story on these increasingly popular HOT couples.” Hot couples? This was about 1996 when my bride of 9 years and I were living in predominantly white Redmond, WA raising two kids, trying to pay a mortgage, driving to school and family events on a nightly basis…I didn’t feel particularly HOT. I felt like any other couple getting along in this world. And yet, Seattle’s leading TV news agency felt the make-up of my marriage was striking enough to feature it in their prime newscast and to characterize it as “HOT”? Really? Over 30 years from the signing of the Civil Rights Act? It was nearly 30 years since

William Shatner as Kirk in a promotional photo...

William Shatner as James T. Kirk kissed Nichelle Nichols playing Lt. Uhura in TV’s Star Trek;

Nichols as Lieutenant Uhura.

marking the first time in television history that a white person kissed a black person.

According to a 2010 CNN report interracial marriages were at an all-time high making up 14.6% of all newly married couples. That’s up from 6.8% in 1980. The report does not distinguish what races or ethnicities make up the interracial couples. A report in the New York Times from just 1 year ago says of every 1000 marriages white men marry black women only 3 times, versus 19 Hispanic women, 14 Asian, and 947 white women. So even now we remain an oddity. But fortunately, a much more accepted oddity.

It’s fair to say that some people have a predisposition attraction to people of a certain race, and at times a different race. That’s fine; and I find no fault with such predispositions. It just doesn’t apply to me. I wasn’t then, and am not now particularly attracted to black women. I am predisposed to be attracted to attractive women, no matter their race or ethnicity. Such is and was the case with my beautiful wife. I didn’t marry her because she was black. I also didn’t marry her because she is attractive, though she is. I married her because she laughed at my jokes, and because I thought she was one of the most genuinely kind people I’d ever met. She still is.

While interracial couples are far less an issue today than they were in the 1980’s, I’m proud my marriage served as one small example of how unimportant race is in the living and loving of people. In 1996 my brother married a woman of Philippine decent. My Dad was all over their wedding, ingraining himself in seemingly every aspect of it. Some time after that occasion I asked my Dad why he was so involved in my brother’s wedding and so uninvolved in mine; why was it OK for my brother to marry a darker skinned Philippino but it wasn’t OK for me to marry a black woman? He answered in the best way he possibly could. He said, “You were Jackie Robinson. You showed that it was OK.”

Thanks for visiting. Comments are welcome.

Me and my Bride- as kids